Posts Tagged ‘Terrell Owens’

No One Sees A Problem With T.O. and Ochocinco in Cincy? No one? Really?

// July 28th, 2010 // No Comments » // Uncategorized

toFor the low, low price of two millions dollars Terrell Owens could be yours!  The Bengals decided this was a fair price for the aging egomaniac and that hey (the ultimate team player) would make a perfect compliment to Chad Ochocinco.  While many on the outside are thinking this could be a good idea, some even claiming that this makes the Bengals a contender for the Super Bowl, I have many many reservations.

First is, how much room is there on the Bengals squad for two huge egos, let alone two in the receiving ranks?  Owens is yet to play well with others, and to be this seems like a powder keg, ala the Balkans-Franz-Ferdinand (thanks 8th Grade World History!).  But instead of millions of Europeans dying, it will be Bengals fans corpses strewn about, with Bill/Cowboys/Eagles/49er fans looking on shaking their head and muttering, “I told you so….”

The other issue is that Owens’ production in Buffalo was way down.  As in he did not deserve that key to the city and should give the money back, type of down.  This has to be his last year, right?  So what exactly will a one year, two million dollar contract mean to a man who isn’t exactly known for loyalty, should the going get tough?  I expect a devolution of epic proportions.

Stand back, get that popcorn ready, this is going to get weird.

I Believe They Call This Getting “Poned!”

// September 18th, 2009 // 3 Comments » // Rob Lunn, Uncategorized

If ever there was a definition for Poned. (or if you are with me and just realized that was a word/phrase commonly used on this thing here we call “The Internet”)  I think that this is it.  The Buffalo News did a story on the lack of a story after Terrell Owen’s first game (excerpt below).  Although for me (and now you reading this) the real story is the commenters after the article hit the web.  This is EXACTLY why the Buffalo News needs comment ninjas.  The definition of PONED:

Buffalo News:

Sullivan: As a leader T.O. dropped the ball

When the Bills signed Terrell Owens, we were told he would be a leader for a young team, a better teammate than we realized, a star who would bring some straight talk and swagger to the locker room.

So I had looked forward to hearing T.O. speak after his first real game as a Bill. And after Monday night’s 25-24 loss to the Patriots, a lot of the media were eager to hear what the iconic receiver would say, what comforting words he would offer to his team and fans.

The answer was nothing. Owens pulled the old silent act after Buffalo blew a late 11-point lead in New England. He took a pass. This article is the gold-standard example as to why 50% of newspaper sports columnists will be waiting tables within the next 10 years. The phrases “beating a dead horse”, “tunnel vision” and “dude, grow up” all apply here. [See: steroids.] Sportswriters have become disconnected with their readership on a level that rivals the relationship between politicians and their constituents. The case of T.O. is the most glaring example. For some reason, Sullivan (along with every other sportswriter in America) has decided to assume the role of moral-highroader/paper evangelist, coming to the conclusion that not only do readers need ANOTHER Terrell Owens’ story, but they are also the only ones smart enough to interpret his actions/non-actions for us. In the process, they reveal the very same self-important, opportunistic qualities that they pretend to rally against during their anti-T.O.-ramblings. Give it up Jerry. Seriously. When will guys like Sullivan realize that their readers know their true motive: self-promotional, big-name piggybacking. Most likely at the same time they realize that they need to start updating their resumes. Kind you can’t drop.

“You’re wasting your time,” Owens told a horde of reporters at his locker. “I have nothing to say.”

Perhaps T.O. concluded it wasn’t in his self-interest to speak. Maybe he had to clear it with those two female advisers, to make certain it didn’t compromise his well-crafted public image.  [the rest here]

Ponage:

This article is the gold-standard example as to why 50% of newspaper sports columnists will be waiting tables within the next 10 years. The phrases “beating a dead horse”, “tunnel vision” and “dude, grow up” all apply here. [See: steroids.] Sportswriters have become disconnected with their readerership on a level that rivals the relationship between politicians and their constituents. The case of T.O. is the most glaring example. For some reason, Sullivan (along with every other sportswriter in America) has decided to assume the role of moral-highroader/paper evangelist, coming to the conclusion that not only do readers need ANOTHER Terrell Owens’ story, but they are also the only ones smart enough to interpret his actions/non-actions for us. In the process, they reveal the very same self-important, opportunistic qualities that they pretend to rally against during their anti-T.O.-ramblings. Give it up Jerry. Seriously. When will guys like Sullivan realize that their readers know their true motive: self-promotional, big-name piggybacking. Most likely at the same time they realize that they need to start updating their resumes.

Well, score one for the bloggers commenters.

Buffalo Columnist Outraged By T.O.’s Good Behavior [Deadspin]

As a leader, T.O dropped the ball [The Buffalo News]

T.O. to the Bills…FWG Cries

// March 11th, 2009 // 1 Comment » // Uncategorized

Prepare to laugh.

Special thanks to Matt Dengler for finding this.